NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+7066%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
120
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
73W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
