NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 165W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0
