Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1440MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +203%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
384bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy