Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +213%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2016
Tesla
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
265W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy