Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 165W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2007
Tesla
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
41W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Ampere
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
90 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy