Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +2386%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2012
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
192bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
3
3584
Shading Units
144
224
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
24
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy