Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1665MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +245%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2019
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
3584
Shading Units
896
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy