Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1440MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +464%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy