Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1440MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +1968%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Tesla
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
20
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy