Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (2331MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +188%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy