Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 172.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1700MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +18%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
28
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
24 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 33
-
GPU Variant
Navi 33
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy