Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (165W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +25%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM
3072bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy