NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (2505MHz vs 1440MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 933.1GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+782%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
384bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
142
3584
Shading Units
18176
224
TMUs
568
96
ROPs
192
224
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
