Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1837MHz vs 1440MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 933.1GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +501%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2024
Tesla
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
96GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM3e
3072bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
16896
224
TMUs
528
96
ROPs
24
224
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GB100
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
208 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

165W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy