Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1650MHz vs 1440MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +35%
10.32 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2021
Tesla
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
36
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
144
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
185W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy