Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro S9000

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +219%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
384bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy