Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI FirePro V7750

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +1915%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
76W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy