Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +1976%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy