CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FireStream 9170
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FireStream 9170
VS
NVIDIA PG506 242
AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 242
+1976%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
PG506 242
VS
FireStream 9170
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
2
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM
3
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
4
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
5
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
6
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
7
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
8
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
9
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
10
NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy