Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +1559%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
512bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
236W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy