Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (2520MHz vs 1440MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 933.1GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +700%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2022
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
3072bit
Memory Bus
384bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
128
3584
Shading Units
16384
224
TMUs
512
96
ROPs
176
224
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy