Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2600MHz vs 1440MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +209%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
3072
224
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
96
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
24 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy