Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (62W vs 70W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +200%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G92
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy