Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M +236%
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy