Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro P400 +33%
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GP107
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy