Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +1003%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
TU106
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy