Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +2185%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 150M
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.120 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.120 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G98
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

62W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy