Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
13888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +9872%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
14080
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy