Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +177%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GF110
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy