Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D +344%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GT216
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy