Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M +125%
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy