Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M +156%
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK104
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy