Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000 +11%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GF106
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy