Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +240%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G94
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy