Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +233%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GM107
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy