Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +387%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
1344
40
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK104
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy