Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +1778%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
1
240
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G98
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy