Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +1957%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
1
240
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G98
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy