Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
10000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +7793%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
10240
40
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GA102
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy