Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1126%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
30
240
Shading Units
1920
40
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
TU106
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy