Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M +300%
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GF104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy