Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +7295%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
26
48
Shading Units
3328
16
TMUs
104
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GA106
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
12 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy