CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+7295%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
VS
RTX A2000
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
26
48
Shading Units
3328
16
TMUs
104
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA106
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
12 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
2
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
3
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
4
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
5
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
6
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
8
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
9
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
10
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy