Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M +201%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK107
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy