Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +11594%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
30
48
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GP102
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy