CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+15446%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
VS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
2
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
3
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
4
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
5
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
6
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA L40G
7
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
8
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy