Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +15446%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy