Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
6608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +20853%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
64GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
104
48
Shading Units
6656
16
TMUs
416
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy