NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
5840 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+13150%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
46
48
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
