Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla M1060 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060 +475%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GT200B
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
188W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy