Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +4711%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2880
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT216
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy