Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +25126%
122.6 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
14592
32
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
760W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
146 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net