NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
+5%
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
24
256
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
